- #Transformers revenge of the fallen autobot full#
- #Transformers revenge of the fallen autobot professional#
If you could get close enough to Sam to even show him his parents then you're close enough to kill / capture him. Why would they then need to traipse out Sam Witwicky's parents? It makes no sense. They were closing in on the humans and their Autobot protectors. The Decepticons had the advantage of speed and superior firepower. Decepticons Don't Need to "Set Traps" With Sam's Parents Thus, if they have the power to destroy a home they have the power to kill a human at close range.Ĥ. My original thought was that mini-Transformers don't fire debilitating weapons, only this is contradicted the moment Sam escapes his room and they proceed to destroy the front yard.
#Transformers revenge of the fallen autobot full#
He's then shot, at a distance of about 10 inches, with a full battery of mini-ordinance. When Sam's kitchen comes alive he's chased into his bedroom. Sam Witwicky Would Have Been Killed by the Mini-Transformers at Close Range Who did this? Where did they get the supplies? And where on Megan Fox's body would all that gauze have been stored?ģ.
#Transformers revenge of the fallen autobot professional#
But five seconds later Shia has what appears to be a professional level wrapping job on his hand. When the gang is all transported to The Middle East Shia's real-life injury is explained by him exploding outwards from Jetfire. Sam Witwicky's Hand Gets Bandaged By Ghosts It would be akin to Megan Fox becoming aroused by a very shiny toaster. They are not in the same genus or species, they aren't even from the same planet. In fact, it's specifically mentioned in the film that the "little ones" are dying without the Energon cube, the very thing The Decipticons are trying to get their hands on, which would further indicate that it's more of a spawning/energy sort of birth for The Transformers.īesides that, the joke doesn't even make sense, because a little Transformer shouldn't find Megan Fox's leg attractive. At the outset of the mythology there weren't even "female" Transformers because the Transformers had no gender at all. Because they are aliens made up entirely of metal. Both of these happenings would you lead one to believe that giant metal robots mate, that they engage in the act of intercourse. Secondly, Devastator seems to have massive Decepticon testicles.
First off, a tiny Transformer attempts to copulate with Megan Fox's leg. There are two examples in the film that would lead you to believe that Transformers are sexual beings.
My issues? Well, since you asked, off the top of my head. If we want better films we've got to stand up against this particular summer film. Making excuses for conglomerates gets us nowhere. So why, with Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen must we settle for plot points that don't make logical sense, character motivations that are silly, and interactions that don't fully add up? The studios spend hundreds of millions on entertainment the least they can do is make all the pieces fit together nicely. Star Trek and Casino Royale are additional examples.
The Dark Knight was a smart and entertaining film. But I think we've got to scuttle this "big, dumb, fun" notion once and for all. We don't want to ruin what is certain to be an interesting experience for you.Īdmittedly, finding logic flaws in a summer blockbuster is fairly easy. If you're still planning on seeing the film then you should transform right on out of here. Warning: This article contains heavy Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen spoilers.